Comments Locked

20 Comments

Back to Article

  • Khalad - Sunday, February 15, 2004 - link

    I was curious, if anyone had any info about what ATI's plans were in regard to a AIW refresh. I understand they are already the leaders in the field, however with the new roadmap, I am curious of any info on the AIW front?
  • Rekonn - Thursday, February 12, 2004 - link

    #7 I don't agree with you. The price bumps aren't just $20 for each speed grade. I could be reading it incorrectly, but to me it looks like

    9600 non pro $102
    9600 pro $149 46% increase from 9600 non pro
    9600 xt $151
    9700 non pro $193 30% increase from 9600 pro
    9700 pro $198
    9800 non pro - none
    9800 pro $215 9% increase from 9700 pro
    9800 xt $416 93% increase from 9800 pro

    A 50% increase in what you're willing to pay is huge, a 10% increase isn't.

    #8 true, if the extras you get from going retail matter to you, then this isn't a fair comparison.
  • XPgeek - Thursday, February 12, 2004 - link

    Hey thanx guys for the info about the memory. I am running an Athlon64 3000+. i have no problems with the ValuRAM at standard clock speeds, but when i try to OC to 220 "FSB" it get wicked unstable. i run timings of 3-7-7-11. i had read in the forums that keeping that last number high allowed for a bit more bandwidth. if i try to set the CAS to 2.5 i get reboots. 2 and i get no boots. i think i'll just stick w this since i dont have a gob of $$ to put down on new mem right now.
  • KristopherKubicki - Thursday, February 12, 2004 - link

    Considering AGP doesnt even use half the headroom it has... good point :)
  • mkruer - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Will someone please explain what the real value of going to PCI-Ex over APG really is when it comes out? I mean is it supposed to have this phenomenal speed, but will it really matter for the cards coming out around the same time?
  • DerekBaker - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Update:

    Seems K8T890 is the same:

    http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1...


    Derek
  • DerekBaker - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Let's hope it's the same for the K8T890. Though of course just because the chipset supports both, doesn't mean the board makers will offer both.


    Derek
  • KristopherKubicki - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Well oddly enough it looks like PT890 will support both interfaces, but i doubt you can use them at the same time.

    http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA3NjUwOD...

    Kristopher
  • Tiorapatea - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Kristopher,

    Reference to announcement of bridge chip:
    http://www.pciexpressdevnet.org/news/archive/msg00...

    0.0 Yes, PCI-E southbridge for Socket A looks unlikely. KT880 is VIA's upcoming Socket A chipset - don't you just hate their numbering system?

    2.2 I definitely want to see nforce 250 (and the GbE version) on Socket 754. I think people often want to buy features for value and avoid paying the full premium for support of the fastest CPUs.

    I can't find the thread any more but there was some speculation/informed comment on Aces that AMD will offer 90nm CPUs on 754.

    4.0 I meant to suggest that there would be a choice of motherboards, one design with PCI-E and a separate one with AGP.
  • KristopherKubicki - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    Trogdor is right. Its not Purple though anymore, i think the purple stuff was formerly Level 2, which is now just called Black.

    Kristopher
  • TrogdorJW - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 - link

    #9, from what I've heard, yes, you will gain a speed boost. However, given that you already have 1 GB of RAM, presumably running at something like 3-4-4-8 timings if it was "value" RAM, you would be scrapping your current memory and paying roughly $320 for 1 GB of Mushkin Black. Unless you're the type that has to have the best of everything, I would stick with what you currently have.

    It also depends on your CPU. If you're using P4, an overclock of 10% will easily wipe out the speed advantage of lower latency RAM. Even a 5% OC would probably do the trick. This should be trivial to do on a P4 system. With Athlon 64, the same is probably true, but my one experience with a 3000+ was that the system was *much* more finicky about the RAM. So if you're looking at Athlon 64, I would get at least the Mushkin Purple.
  • XPgeek - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Kristopher, is it better to get a higher grade of PC3200 vs, like, Kingston ValuRAM? i currently have 2 512MB sticks of the KVR400X64C3/512 in my system. would i gain anything by getting something like Mushkin Black?
  • eBauer - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Although you must take into account, you're comparing a $200 RETAIL 9700 Pro to a $219 OEM/BULK 9800 Pro... The 3 year warranty is nice. Retail 9800 Pro's are going for much higher...
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Interesting point Rekonn,

    The problem becomes if each card is "only" $20 difference from the other, you continually keep saying that. A 9600 Pro is only $20 more than a 9600. A 9600XT is only $20 more than a 9600 Pro. A 9700 non pro is only $20 more than a 9600 XT, etc etc.

    I agree its a difficult choice ebtween the two cards. I would say use your best judgement. In a couple weeks i would hope the 9800 pro is under $200 which would easily make it my #1 choice.

    Kristopher
  • Rekonn - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Why is the 9700 Pro for $200 recommended, when you can get the Sapphire 9800 Pro for $219 ?
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Tiorapatea: Vendors claim there will be no premium on PCI-E cards over AGP. Still you ahve to upgrade though. I have not heard anything about a AGP to PCI-E bridge or PCI-E to AGP bridge.

    0.0 I dont think we will see too many future VIA boards. KT890 looks to be the end of the line for them.

    2.2 For whatever reason someone decided it was a good idea to implement nForce3 250 on Socket 754 and on Socket 939 so we will see another revision of the 754 boards. I think its kind of pointless because the AMD roadmaps dont show speeds on the 754 past 3700+. The roadmaps have been wrong before though so dont put too much faith in them.

    4.0 I would not assume this is true either. The PT890 chipset *can* support AGP, but that still doesnt mean vendors will put 2 separate buses on there. PT890 will probably be a budget chipset anyway, it really looks uncompetitive. Particularly, the first round of southbridges to launch with PT890 are fairly weak compared to SiS and Intel's solutions.

    Kristopher


  • ripdude - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Thanks number 2 and 3.
    I'm going to wait for the new sockets, being a student my budget decides.
    Unless the new sockets are very expensive I'll go for the 939.
  • Tiorapatea - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    AGP will live on for a while. Nvidia has developed a PCI Express to AGP bridge, which effectively means it can produce one set of card designs and offer them to owners of both AGP and PCI Express motherboards. ATI has not done this so one may speculate that it may not offer its newest designs for the AGP slot for quite so long as Nvidia.

    What is muddying the waters right now is that chipset vendors seem to have decided that the current and forthcoming processors from AMD and Intel will not all be offered motherboard designs that provide a choice between PCI Express and AGP for the graphics interconnect.

    Therefore, upgraders are faced with interdependent choices - your CPU choice will affect not only your highest likely CPU upgrade for a given motherboard but also your highest likely graphics card upgrade.

    Thus, at this point, it seems as if:

    0.0 Socket A AthlonXP CPUs look like they will be confined to motherboards that offer only an AGP slot. (Note, however, that PCI Express 1x slots for peripherals may be offered, for example if VIA decides to implement VT8251 in an AthlonXP chipset.)
    0.1 Athlon XP has likely reached its highest speed grade (buy a 2500+ and overclock).
    0.2 Still a great buy for many people but I won't go into that.

    1.0 Pentium 4 on Socket 478 will get PCI Express chipsets from all chipset vendors.
    1.1 LGA 775, a new socket out in April, will bring an end to official speed grade increases on Socket 478. Prescott 3.6 GHz will be last Intel release for Socket 478.
    1.2 It may or may not have reached its practical highest speed grade (buy a 2.4C/2.6C/2.8C and overclock to around 3.4-3.6?). Prescott on Socket 478 may well go higher but it remains to be seen whether this can be done with a reasonably economical and reliable cooling system.
    1.3 More expensive than AthlonXP, especially after motherboard costs but does perform better in many applications.

    2.0 Athlon64 will bo offered a choice of AGP or PCI express motherboards.
    2.1 Socket 754 may not have a very long life. Official roadmap goes as far as 3700+ (from today's 3000+ to 3400+) but AMD may offer more when it moves to a 90nm process from Q4 '04.
    2.2 Many people are waiting for Nvidia to release its nforce 250 chipset before going for this platform. Many are also waiting for Socket 939, which may offer higher performance and a longer life. Still others are waiting for Microsoft to release its 64 bit port of WindowsXP.
    2.3 Overall, Athlon64 is a very promising CPU.

    3.0 Athlon64 on Socket 939 is scheduled for launch on 29th March '04 at a 3700+ rating. Socket 939 will add dual channel memory support for the Athlon64.
    3.1 Socket 939 motherboards will offer either a PCI Express slot or an AGP slot for graphics cards.
    3.2 This socket will likely have a longer life than Socket 754.
    3.3 I expect Socket 939 platforms to sell at a significant premium to Socket 754 for some time, partly because of the high initial speed grade of the CPU at launch relative to existing Athlon64 CPUs, which start at 3000+.

    4.0 Pentium 4E (Prescott) on socket LGA775 should be out in April. Neither Intel nor SIS will offer chipsets that support an AGP slot. VIA will offer a choice between PCI Express and AGP.
    4.1 I would expect this platform to launch with a 3.6 GHz CPU.
    4.2 It is currently unclear how this processor will scale but, subject to better control of its thermal characteristics, one might speculate that 4 GHz could be achieved by the end of this year (I am bit sceptical).
    4.3 If the heat dissipation of Prescott proves to be a problem, you might need a new case, a new power supply and a new motherboard if you ever want to upgrade your CPU.

    What would I do?
    I have no idea because I don't know what you want to do on your system. That is something you need to clear up before you spend any money.
    My attitude is that, in general, we'd all be better off running slightly older hardware and concentrating on supporting Free Software.
  • sipc660 - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    my advice to no #1 is to wait for pci-e anyway and than buy a fast good quality agp card which will be cheaper and serve those 2-3 years.

    in three years we'll have developed PCI express - 2 fully
    (which i am working on now)

    and 128 bit computing ;)
  • ripdude - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link

    Neat row once again, I wonder if its usefull to wait for the PCI-express cards.
    My upgrade cycle isn't that quick (once every 2-3 years).

    The next generation pc-stuff (about may I believe) with socket 939, LGA775, PCI-express etc will be expensive. Will it be usefull for a once-in-a-while upgrader to wait for the next generation, or will AGP live on for a year or so?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now