ASUS Striker II Extreme: Mucho Bang, Mucho Bucks
by Kris Boughton on April 11, 2008 7:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Complete BIOS Tuning Guide - "Over Voltage"
Over Voltage
CPU Voltage - [Auto, 1.10000 ~ 2.40000 in 0.00625 steps] This setting controls the processor supply voltage by manually adjusting the target CPU VID.
Our measurements have shown the ASUS Striker II Extreme to have a nominal load line impedance (RLL) of approximately 0.80mΩ meaning that for each ampere (A) drawn by the processor the regulated supply voltage will droop 0.8mV. Given this, a 45nm quad-core QX9650 CPU with a full-load power consumption of 80W should draw about 65A, resulting in a total drop of around 0.05V from idle to full-load.
Loadline Calibration - [Enabled, Disabled] Setting Enabled will effectively remove any negative feedback in the CPU supply voltage regulation circuit. This means that there will be little to no difference between the CPU supply voltage at idle and full-load. This does not mean however that there will be no offset seen between the idle voltage and the CPU Voltage VID as selected in BIOS. Disabled follows the Intel specification and allows the CPU supply voltage to droop under load as properly designed. We recommend you leave this Disabled and increase CPU Voltage as needed to satisfy the minimum operating voltage needed under load.
CPU PLL Voltage - [Auto, 1.50 ~ 3.00 in 0.02 steps] Selecting a higher PLL (phase lock-loop) voltage may help the installed CPU clock higher or may assist with maintaining stability when operating at higher FSB speeds. Most users will find they do not need to set this to anything above 1.50. Exercise caution when experimenting with higher values as there have been reported cases of CPUs losing cores after being subjected to voltages in excess of about 2.00V.
CPU VTT Voltage - [Auto, 1.20 ~ 2.46 in 0.02 steps] VTT is the termination voltage for data lines used to interface the MCH with the CPU die(s) via the Front Side Bus. Higher values can provide additional FSB overclocking margin, especially with 45nm dual-core processors and quad-cores CPUs in general. We have never found any additional gains to be had above 1.36 when using air- or water-cooling. Setting Auto should default to 1.10V for 45nm CPUs and 1.20V for 65nm CPUs. Knowing this, there appears to be a dead band between 1.10V and 1.20V where intermediate values cannot be selected - we are working with ASUS engineering to get this corrected.
Memory Voltage - [Auto, 1.50 ~ 3.10 in 0.02 steps] DDR3 memory is rated for standard operation at just 1.5V with most performance memory kits specifying the use of voltages between 1.75V and 1.95V inclusive. Increasing the memory voltage will have a direct impact on the ability to run the installed memory at higher frequencies, with tighter timings, or both. This voltage will droop slightly under load, so consider this when selecting the appropriate value. Our recommendation is never to exceed the manufacturer's maximum warranted voltage. With that said, values in excess of about 2.30V with DDR3 are a death sentence.
NB Core Voltage - [Auto, 1.30 ~ 2.20 in 0.02 steps] This is the main power supply voltage for the 790i SPP. Any of the following adjustments may require an increase in this voltage: higher memory operating frequency, tighter memory timings, enabling P1 and/or P2, the use of additional memory modules (including higher-density modules), and increases in PCIe Slot 1/Slot 2 base link speeds. We were able to reach DDR3-2000 speeds (500FSB) using 4x2GB of OCZ DDR3 with only 1.52. This is near full load for this chipset, suggesting that higher voltages will only lead to additional heating and eventual instabilities.
SB Core Voltage - [Auto, 1.50 ~ 1.85 in 0.05 steps] This is the main power supply voltage for the 570 MCP. Leave this voltage set to 1.50 unless you increase PCIE Bus, Slot 3, MHz, LDT Frequency, and/or SPP<->MCP Ref Clock, MHz and find instabilities due to the change(s).
23 Comments
View All Comments
takumsawsherman - Saturday, April 12, 2008 - link
But for $400, you only get Firewire 400. Is that like a key, or something? If we pay $800 for a board, will they finally feel as though they can afford to add Firewire800, as Gigabyte did on their $200 boards like 3 or 4 years ago?When they talk about adding firewire itself to a board, does it never occur to them that a faster variation has existed for 5 or 6 years now? How insulting.
Grandpa - Saturday, April 12, 2008 - link
It doesn't matter what the price, performance, make, or model. If the board is unstable I don't want it! I had an Abit board once with a VIA chipset. It corrupted data when large files were transferred between drives. Several BIOS updates later, with the performance down to a crawl, it still corrupted data. Because of that ugly bad memory, stability is number one important for me. So this review is very relevant to others like myself.Super Nade - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
As far as I know, the capacitors you mention are made by Fujitsu's Media division (FP-Cap series), not Fairchild semiconductor. Fujitsu did try to gobble up Fairchild in the 80's, but the US government killed the deal. Apart from this, I am not aware of any connection between these two companies.Here is the link--> http://jp.fujitsu.com/group/fmd/en/services/capaci...">http://jp.fujitsu.com/group/fmd/en/services/capaci...
S-N
Stele - Saturday, April 12, 2008 - link
Super Nade's right. The vendor marking on the capacitors - which have been the same for almost all such solid electrolytic polymer caps used on Asus boards for some time now - is very much that of Fujitsu: a letter 'F' in Courier-esque font between two horizontal lines.Interestingly - and confusingly - however, once upon a time this logo was indeed that of Fairchild Semiconductor... the deal that almost happened in the 80s may have something to do with Fujitsu's current use of the said logo. Either way, Faichild Semi have long since changed to their current logo (a stylised italic 'f') so today, any current/new electronic/semiconductor component carrying the F-between-bars logo is almost certainly a Fujitsu product.
jojo29 - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
Just wondering how the Anandtech's Choice P5E3 Premium ( which i plan on buying) stacks up against this Striker? Any comments? Or did i miss something in the aricle as i was only able to skim through it, as im at work atm, and dontcoughwantcoughtogetcaughtbymybosscough...kjboughton - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
We used one X48 motherboard in this review and it was the ASUS P5E3 Premium. Enjoy the full read when you make it home. ;)ImmortalZ - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
You mention that overclocking the PCI-E bus provided tangible performance benefits on the EVGA board.Did you read about the rumblings around the net about some G92 based cards overclocking their GPU with the PCI-E bus? There are supposedly two clock sources for these type of cards - one on board and the other slaved to the PCI-E bus.
Are you sure that the performance improvement is not because of this anomaly?
CrystalBay - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
Hi Kris, while UT3 does scale very well with multi-core. The game it self has no DX10 support as of yet. Hopefully EPIC will will enable it in a future update...Glenn - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
All the benchies and comparisons are great, but how does it compare to a P35 board? A 965 or X38 board? I doubt you will convert those that already own an X48 and I (P35) have no point of reference within this article to see if I'm 5, 10 or 25% behind the preformance curve?Rolphus - Friday, April 11, 2008 - link
Interesting review... only one question though. Why use the 32-bit version of Crysis on Vista x64? Is there an issue with the 64-bit version that I don't know about?